Madras High CourtCONT P/2738/2018closed

R.Arul v. Ponnaiyan Ias

2019-08-22Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated:22.08.2019 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.PARTHIBAN Cont.P.No.2738 of 2018 R.Arul ... Petitioner vs.

Thiru Ponnaiyan,I.A.S., The District Collector, Kancheepuram District ... Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 25.01.2018 passed in W.P.No.18747 of 2012.

For Petitioner .. No appearance For Respondent .. Mr.J.Ramesh,A.G.P.

ORDER

Alleging that the order of this Court, dated 25.01.2018 made in W.P.No.18747 of 2012, has not been complied with by the respondent, the petitioner has come up with the present contempt petition.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ that the direction issued by this Court, vide its order

dated 25.01.2018 has been complied with by the respondent, by passing proceedings, in Na.Ka.No.7561/2018=M1, dated 02.02.2019, rejecting the claim of the petitioner. 3.Recording the said submission, this contempt petition is closed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection order passed by the respondent, it is always open to him to challenge the said order in an appropriate proceedings, in the manner known to law and it is not open to him to sustain the present contempt petition, in view the compliance reported by the respondent.

SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) MSK //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2019. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

Smi/09/10/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/