Madras High CourtWP/32588/2018disposed of

Parvatha v. The District Collector

2019-02-05Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.02.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.32588 of 2018 Parvatha

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3. The Sub-Collector, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

4. The Tahsildar, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

...Respondents

Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to issue patta in the petitioner name for the property at Survey No.4/2, 3/3,& 40/3 to an leaved extent of 3.50 acres in total extent of 8.50 acres out of which remaining part of 5 acres bears patta in the petitioner name in Mensanvoddi Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 08.10.2018. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Rakhi For Respondents :

Mr.R.Govindasamy Special Government Pleader O R D E R Mr.I.Sathish Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, this main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. Heard both sides.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The petitioner seeks for Mandamus directing the 4th respondent to issue patta in the petitioner name for the property at Survey No.4/2, 3/3,& 40/3 to an leaved extent of 3.50 acres in total extent of 8.50 acres out of which remaining part of 5 acres bears patta in the petitioner name in Mensanvoodi Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 08.10.2018.

4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said representation has not been considered so far. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner as it is for the 4th respondent to consider and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 4th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.10.2018 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner as well as the interested parties, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the 4th respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// vsi Sub Assistant Registrar To