M.Sithaiyan v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.03.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.No.37777 of 2018 M.Sithaiyan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The commissioner of Police, Salem City Police, Salem.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Salem City Police, Sooramangalam, Salem.

3. The Inspector of Police, D3, Sooramangalam Police Station, Salem City Police, Sooramangalam, Salem.

4. K.Palanisamy

...Respondents

The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from in any way interfering in the civil dispute between petitioner and the fourth respondent pending disposal in appeal A.S.No.33/18 and AS 34/18 on the file of subordinate Judge Omalur.

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Vasavi Sridevi For Respondents : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian R4 1/3

Mr.E.Veda Bagathsingh SGP RR1 to 3 M.DHANDAPANI, J.

rli

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition.

2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 08.03.2023 Index: yes / no Internet : yes / no Speaking / Non speaking order rli To

1. The commissioner of Police, Salem City Police, Salem.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Salem City Police, Sooramangalam, Salem.

3. The Inspector of Police, D3, Sooramangalam Police Station, Salem City Police, Sooramangalam, Salem.

2/3

3/3