Asmaa v. State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.01.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.29263 of 2018 1.Asmaa 2.M.Rahuman @ Kalil Rahuman

...Petitioners

Vs.

The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

...Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Sathish Kumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A3 and A1 in Crime No.89 of 2017 and investigation is pending before respondent police.

4. Under such circumstances, once the regular FIR has been registered, the question of "Not to harass" will not arise. Any direction issued by this Court at this stage will amount to interfering with the investigation conducted by the respondent police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpl/mpa To 1.The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Madras.

+1cc to M/s.A.Sathishkumar, Advocate SR.No.322 Crl.O.P.No.29263 of 2018 RSI(CO) GMY(30/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/