← Library
Madras High CourtA/10205/2018closed

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd v. Elite Travels Prop Ms.Anjum Munshi

2020-07-23Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

A.No.10205 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.07.2020 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR A .No.10205 of 2018 M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, 'Dare House' No.2, N.S.C Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai-600 001.

Represented by its Authorised Signatory ... Applicant Vs.

1.M/s.Elite Travels, Prop. Ms.Anjum Munshi, R.No.102, Hira Apt., Mahagiri, Koliwada, Thane, Maharashtra 400 601.

2.Mrs.Suraiya Ashfaque Munshi, R.No.102, Hira Apt., Mahagiri, Koliwada, Thane, Maharashtra 400 601.

... Respondents PRAYER: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules r/w Section 9 (ii) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, to direct the respondents to furnish security for the sum of Rs.2,78,374.76/- within a time fixed by this Court failing which to order attachment of the immovable properties more fully described in the schedule to the judges summons till enforcement of the award that may be ultimately passed in the arbitration proceedings and a copy of the attachment order be transmitted through the District and Sessions Court, Thane, Maharashtra and the attachment order may be hand delivered to the applicant for transmission. For Applicant : Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar For Respondents : No Appearance http://www.judis.nic.in

A.No.10205 of 2018 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

gsk O R D E R This application has been filed to direct the respondents to furnish security for a sum of Rs.2,78,374.76/- failing which to attach the immovable property of the respondents morefully described in the schedule, till the enforcement of the Award that may be ultimately passed in the arbitration proceedings.

2. This Court, by an Order dated 05.03.2020 directed the respondents to furnish security for the suit claim on or before 31.03.2020 and on failing to furnish security, there shall be Order of attachment.

3. Despite the Order of this Court directing to furnish security, the respondents have not furnished any security and none appeared for the respondents.

4. In view of the same, there shall be an Order of attachment of the immovable property described in the schedule and this application is closed. The registry is directed to communicate this Order to the concerned Registrar. 23.07.2020 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No gsk http://www.judis.nic.in A .No.10205 of 2018