Madras High CourtWP/34334/2018disposed of

M.Mathalakshmi v. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission

2019-02-27Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.34334 of 2018 and WMP.Nos.39910 & 39911 of 2018 M.Mathalakshmi ... Petitioner .Vs.

1. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Member Secretary,

2. Controller of Examinations, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the list dated 17.12.2018 issued by the 2nd respondent with annexure as published in the official website of the 1st respondent for the post of Agriculture Officer (Extension) included in Tamil Nadu Agriculture Extension Service as per the Notification No.09/2018 dated 03.05.2018 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same in so far as the rejection of the petitioner's candidature in registration No.190002334 and consequently direct the respondents to call for the petitioner to attend oral test to be held on 02.01.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sugendran For Respondent Nos.1&2 : Mr.M.Devendran Standing Counsel

O R D E R

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to quash the list dated 17.12.2018, issued by the second respondent with annexure as published in the official website for recruitment to the post of Agricultural Officer (Extension).

2. Pursuant to the impugned order passed by this Court on 21.12.2018, the writ petitioner was permitted to attend the oral test. However, the result pertains to the writ petitioner is withheld on the ground of the pendency of the writ petition.

3. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner made a submission that the respondents shall publish the results enabling the petitioner to understand the result in respect of his selection.

4. This Court of an opinion that, now the writ petitioner is not pressing the other grounds raised in the writ petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the respondents are directed to publish the result of the writ petitioner in respect of the selection conducted for direct recruitment to the post of Agricultural Officer (Extension) in the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Extension Service. However, the respondents are bound to follow the other rules and regulations in relation to the process of selection.

5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Pkn/ssm Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Member Secretary,

2. The Controller of Examinations, +1cc to Mr.S.Sugendran, Advocate, SR.No.18389 +1cc to Dr.M.Devendran, Advocate, SR.No.19298 W.P.No.34334 of 2018 Kak(09/04/2019)