Aashish Surana v. State Rep. By
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.30272 of 2018 1.Aashish Surana 2.Surender ...petitioners ..Vs..
The State Rep. By the Inspector of Police, S-13, Chrompet Police Station, Chrompet, chennai. ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners.
For Petitioners : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Chopra For Respondent : Mr.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant.
2.Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submits that based on the complaint petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed. A closure report has also been produced before this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4.The same is recorded. It is made clear, now that the complaint has been closed, the respondent Police shall not call the petitioners under the guise of enquiry and harass them. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tta To 1.The Inspector of Police, S-13, Chrompet Police Station, Chrompet, chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor, Hight Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.Ramesu, Advocate, S.R.No. 89700 Crl.O.P.No.30272 of 2018 GN(10/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/