← Library
Madras High CourtWP/34862/2018disposed of

C.Ramalingam, v. The District Collector,

2019-02-05Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.34862 of 2018 C.Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiriuvallur.

2.The Tahsildar, Maduravoyal, Tiruvallur District.

3.The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

4.The Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax, Kunrathur, Chennai.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner application filed on 22.12.2017 and issue patta for the petitioner's land situated at Plot No.18, Door No.2/18, Venkateswara Avenue, Sabari Nagar, Porur, Chennai - 600 116 comprised in Survey No.51/2 in an extent of 5.53 cents in Porur Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Tiruvallur District without requiring NOC from the 4th respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Saravana Vel For Respondents: Mr.E.Balamurugan, Special Government Pleader.

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed seeking for a Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's application filed on 22.12.2017 and issue patta for the petitioner's land situated at Plot No.18, Door No.2/18, Venkateswara Avenue, Sabari Nagar, Porur, Chennai - 600 116, comprised in Survey No.51/2 in an extent of 5.53 cents in Porur Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Tiruvallur District without requiring NOC from the 4th respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. After notice, the matter is taken up for hearing today. The learned Special Government Pleader produced a copy of the proceedings dated 02.02.2019 issued by the Tahsildar, Maduravoyal, in rejecting the request of the petitioner for grant of patta. Therefore, he contended that it is for the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law.

3. Though, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that such rejection is bad in law, this Court is of the view that it is for the petitioner to work out his remedy by challenging the said order dated 02.02.2019, by filing appropriate proceedings.

4. Accordingly, without expressing any view on merits of the contentions raised in this Writ Petition, the same is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order in the manner known to law. If a copy of the order is not served on the petitioner, the 2nd respondent shall serve the copy within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gsi/vsi To 1.The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiriuvallur.

2.The Tahsildar, Maduravoyal, Tiruvallur District.

3.The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

4.The Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax, Kunrathur, Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.J.Saravanavel, Advocate, S.R.No.9674 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.10211 W.P.No.34862 of 2018 CA(CO) rrs 06/03/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/