Madras High CourtCRP/4329/2018dismissed

A.Mohamed Yusuff Siraj v. N.Perumal

2021-07-28Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

C.R.P.(N.P.D).No.4329 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.07.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN C.R.P.(NPD) No. 4329 of 2018

1. A.Mohamed Yusuff Siraj,

2. A.Mohamed Meera Rabiq Ali

3. R.Pathamuthu Sulthana Nasrin

4. Aayeesha Sulthana Sheeba

5. R.Katheeja Sulthana Almash ...

Petitioners Vs N.Perumal ...

Respondent Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.09.2018 made in I.A.No.377 of 2018 in O.S.No.101 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Erode. For Petitioners : Mr.Gowri Shankar for Mr.G.Jeremiah

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 27.09.2018 made in I.A.No.377 of 2018 in O.S.No.101 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Erode, thereby dismissing the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 1/2

C.R.P.(N.P.D).No.4329 of 2018 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.J, Lpp

2. When the matter was posted for admission on 27.12.2018, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, it was adjourned to 03.01.2019. Today, when the matter is listed, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought for adjournment.

3. In view of the above, it clearly shows that the learned counsel for the petitioners has no interest in proceeding with the case further. Further, the Civil Revision Petition is pending for the past three years, without even admitting the same or ordering notice. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.

28.07.2021 Lpp Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To The Principal District Munsif, Erode.

C.R.P.(NPD) No.4329 of 2018 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/2