L.A.Thavamani v. D.Sabitha Ias
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.07.2015
CORAM
The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Contempt Petition No.2759 of 2013 1.L.A.Thavamani 2.S.Jacob 3.M.K.Rajamanickam 4.M.Samikannu 5.V.Ramarasu 6.S.Poovathimudali 7.N.Venkatesan 8.R.Rangasamy 9.P.Kaveri 10.G.Perumal 11.R.Perumal 12.A.Manickam Ammal 13.V.Beeman 14.L.P.Siddharasu 15.M.Kannan 16.N.Jeyapal 17.K.Gomathi 18.V.Murugesan 19.P.M.Sarangabani 20.K.Ovirajam 21.M.Mariappan 22.K.Murugesan 23.O.Venkatammal 24.M.Sennappan 25.V.Subbulakshmi 26.K.C.Kandasamy 27.J.Krishnan 28.G.Perumal 29.L.P.Lakshmi 30.L.D.Dhanam 31.K.Siddhan 32.R.Ramakrishnan 33.G.Perumal 34.I.Natchathiramary 35.B.Rasagopal 36.K.Kamalam 37.A.Balamani 38.D.Jeyakannan 39.V.Dhandapani
40.T.Chandra 41.G.Pachaiyammal 42.M.Saroja 43.M.Pushpavalli 44.R.Kolandai 45.S.Gopal 46.D.V.Manonmani 47.P.Madhaiyan 48.Dhanalakshmi 49.S.Krishnan 50.F.Jacob 51.S.Vedavalli 52.M.Murugesan 53.M.Muniyappan 54.F.Juli Esabella 55.G.Sulochana 56.V.Duraisamy 57.N.Ranjitham 58.C.K.Ramalakshmi 59.K.Neelavathi 60.Thamgam 61.K.Thamilarasi 62.P.V.Sridharan 63.V.Thangavel 64.T.Radha Rukmani 65.R.Jeeva 66.R.Vasantha 67.G.Aranganathan 68.T.P.Vanithamani 69.K.Lakshmi 70.P.Perumal 71.A.G.Mallika 72.K.Saraswathi 73.N.Rajagopal 74.S.Pangajam 75.V.Nirmala 76.R.Jeyalakshmi 77.S.Gunasekaran 78.K.Babi 79.K.Lakshmi 80.K.Mangaiyarkarasi 81.P.Poongothai 82.G.Siddhan 83.M.Sulochana 84.A.Santhamani 85.D.Gopal 86.P.Natarajan 87.N.G.Natarajan .. Petitioners -vsD.Sabitha, I.A.S.
The Secretary to Government, School Education Department,
Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.
.. Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for her act of wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 12.07.2011 made in W.A.No.2379 of 2010.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Thirupathi For Respondent : Mr.K.Karthikeyan, G.A.
* * * * *
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.Learned Government Advocate states that out of 87 petitioners, in respect of 49 petitioners, the order has been complied with and in respect of 38 petitioners, they are already drawing more pay or equal pay while applying G.O.Ms.No.234 dated 10.9.2009. The said statement is taken on record.
3.However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners have not received any such proceedings as of now. The copy of the said proceedings be communicated to the individual petitioners. If the petitioners are not satisfied with the said proceedings, it is open for them to challenge the same in separate proceedings.
4.In view of the aforesaid, we close the contempt proceedings.
Sra SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2015. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SS/CO/14/10/2015 To The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.