← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9877/2013dismissed as infructuous

D.Kavitha v. State Of Tamilnadu

2017-01-25Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 25.01.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.9877 of 2013 and M.P.No.2 of 2013 Tmt.D.Kavitha ...

Petitioner - Vs -

1. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2. The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai-600 006.

3. The Director, State Council for Education, Research & Training, Chennai-600 006.

...

Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.118, School Education(U1) Department, dated 03.12.2009 insofar as para 7 denying the evaluation in respect of the certificates which were obtained after 2008-2009 from other States and the consequential order passed by the 3rd Respondent in his Proceedings O.Mu.No.2625/A3/2011 dated 13.05.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondents to evaluate the petitioner's Certificate of Trained Teachers' Certificate bearing Regn.No.0917012 issued by the Government of Kerala.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ponjeganathan for Mr.A.Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, Government Advocate

O R D E R

According to the petitioner, she has secured 50% marks in Teacher Training Course in the year 2010. As far as evaluation is concerned, originally direction was given to evaluate the Certificate of other States in respect of the persons who have secured 50% marks in S.S.L.C. and 50% marks in the Teacher Training Course, thereafter, it was reduced to 45% marks in Teacher Training Course in respect of a person who secured 50% in Plus 2. As per the aforesaid order, the petitioner is eligible for evaluation of his certificate, since she secured 50% marks in Plus 2 and 50% marks in the Teacher Training Course. However, the respondents rejected the request of the petitioner for evaluation of her certificate, by referring G.O.Ms.No.118, School Education Department, dated 03.12.2009. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner.

2. The learned Government Advocate for the respondents has submitted that in the light of the order passed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.118, School Education Department, dated 03.12.2009, certificates in respect of the students, who have joined the Teacher Training Course after 2008-2009 onwards and got the Teacher Training Course in other States cannot be evaluated.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner has produced the evaluation certificate, dated 11.12.2014, issued by the Director of State Council of Educational Research & Training, Chennai. Therefore, the writ petition becomes infructuous at this stage.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. It is open to the petitioner to submit a fresh evaluation certificate in the future selection process. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar ssn To

1. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2. The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai-600 006.

3. The Director, State Council for Education, Research & Training, Chennai-600 006.

+ 1 cc to Mr.A.Chandrasekar, Advocate Sr.No.5090 W.P.No.9877 of 2013 and M.P.No.2 of 2013 GJ(CO) RRI 21/04/2017