P. Sarojini(Died) v. R. Kausalyadevi
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2018 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AS(MD)No.54 of 2017 and CMP (MD) No.3501/2017 and Cross Objection (MD) No.20 of 2017 A.S.(MD) No.54/2017 P.Sarojini (died) Nainar (died) 1.Uma Maheswari 2.Minor Sorna Meenakshi 3.Minor. Dharshani ... Appellants/Defendants 4to6 (Appellants 2 & 3 are minors and represented by their mother 1st appellant herein) vs.
1.R.Kausalyadevi W/o.Raveendran No.317-H Subramaniyapuram Ambasamuthiram Post Tirunelveli District.
S.Thanapalan S/o.Seeniyappa Nadar Door No.8, Sivankovil South Street Sivagangai Town and District.
Who is the power agent of R.Kausalyadevi... 1stRespondent /Plaintiff 2.M.Deniel Raj ... 2nd Respondent/Defended Prayer : Appeal Suit filed under Order 11 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 23.12.2014 in O.S.No.05 of 2004 on the file of the District Judge, Sivagangai.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mr.V.Sitharanjandas
Cross Objection (MD) No.20/2017 1.R.Kausalyadevi W/o.Raveendran No.317-H Subramaniyapuram Ambasamuthiram Post Tirunelveli District.
S.Thanapalan S/o.Seeniyappa Nadar Door No.8, Sivankovil South Street Sivagangai Town and District.
Who is the power agent of R.Kausalyadevi ... Cross Appellant/ 1stRespondent vs.
1.Uma Maheswari 2.Minor Sorna Meenakshi 3.Minor. Dharshani (Respondents 2 & 3 are minors and represented by their mother 1st respondent herein)... Respondents 1to3/Appellants 4.M.Deniel Raj ... 4th Respondents/2nd Respondent Prayer : Cross Appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 23.12.2014 in O.S.No.05 of 2004 on the file of the District Judge, Sivagangai. For Appellant IN Cross Objection and Respondent-1 in A.S.54/17 : Mr.V.Sitharanjandas For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar for R1 to R3 in in cross objection Appellants in A.S.54/17 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.RAJA, J.) Since the dispute is settled out of Court, learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for the cross appellant seek permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal suit and the Cross objection. Learned counsel for the appellant also circulated a letter dated 26.09.2018 to the Registry. Learned counsel for the cross appellant has made an endorsement.
2.In view of the letter circulated to the Registry by the learned counsel for the appellant and the endorsement made, this appeal suit and the Cross objection are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(cs-III)
To The District Judge, Sivagangai.
+1cc to Mr.R.Vijayakumar Advocate in SR.No.90772 +1cc to Mr.V.Sitharanjandas Advocate in SR.No.90307 AS(MD)No.54 of 2017 and CMP (MD) No.3501/2017 and Cross Objection (MD) No.20 of 2017 12.10.2018 RR NM SV SAR3 28.11.2018 3P 4C