Krshnaveni v. Karuppayi

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.07.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN A.S (MD)No.150 of 2013 1.Krishnaveni 2.Leelavathi 3.Subramani 4.Sekar 5.Palanisamy 6.Muthulakshmi 7.Lakshmi ...Appellants/ Plaintiffs 1 to 4 & 7 to 8 Vs.

1.Karuppayi 2.Sundarambal 3.Arunagiri 4.Valliyamal 5.Backiyam 6.Boolokam 7.CSI Church Rep. by its Administrator Kujiliyamparai, Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul.

8.M.Marimuthu 9.A.Meena 10.Somraj 11.Murugaiyya 12.Sadiq Ali 13.S.Balraj 14.Dhanalakshmi 15.P.Selvi 16.P.Sellapan 17.S.Revathi 18.S.Raghuraman 19.Kasirajan ..... Respondents/ Defendants 1 to 19 20.Rani ... Respondent/5th Plaintiff 21.Logeshwaran (Minor) rep. by 20th respondents S/o.Pandiyan Rajendram Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur.

... Respondent/6th plaintiff PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the decree and judgment of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul, dated 15.03.2013 in O.S.No.62 of 2008 and allow the the appeal.

For Appellants : Mr.K.Prabhakar For Respondents : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar

J U D G M E N T

When the matter came up for hearing on 24.06.2022, the matter was directed to be listed on 14.07.2022 with an endorsement that 'No further time will be granted'. Today (14.07.2022) when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants is not ready to argue the appeal suit. This shows that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.

2.Accordingly, the appeal suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No 14.07.2022 am

To

1. The Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

am A.S (MD)No.150 of 2013 14.07.2022