Madras High CourtCMA(MD)/716/2005dismissed as infructuous

Ramasamy Naicker(Died) v. The Tahsildar

2024-01-18Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran7 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.01.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and C.M.P.(MD).No.4597 of 2005 1.Ramasamy Naickar (Died) .. Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant 2.Panchammal 3.Meenammal 4.Muthusamy 5.Algulakshmi 6.R.Rajamuthu 7.Muthulakshmi 8.Packiyalakshmi 9.Nagajothi .. Appellants (Appellants 2 to 9 are brought on record as LRs of deceased sole appellant vide Court order dated 21.03.2017 made in C.M.P.(MD).Nos.2550 to 2552 of 2017 in C.M.A.(MD).No.716 of 2005) Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Taluk Office Building, Thirumangalam Town.

2.The District Collector Collectorate, Madurai - 20.

3.P.Virumandi 4.R.Jothi 5.J.Muthulakshmi 6.T.Virumandi 7.Lingam 8.M.Kidaiyan 9.M.S.Ganesan 10.R.Alagar Thevar 11.A.Jeyaraj 12.A.Katchammal 13.C.Vijaya 14.K.Jeyakumar 15.K.Jothi 16.M.S.Murugan

17.K.Kannan 18.Packiam 19.O.Kannan 20.K.Sakthivel 21.R.Jeyaraman 22.Indirani 23.G.Pandiammal 24.P.Annakodi 25.Kaanthayammal 26.M.S.P.Raj Pillai 27.Parasakthi 28.K.Selvam 29.M.Periyakaruppan 30.Meena 31.K.Pandiammal 32.Baluchamy Thevar 33.M.Chellakannu 34.Kazhuvayee

35.M.Ramalakshmi 36.Karuppiah Chettiar 37.R.Ilangovan 38.Jegan Eagali 39.Perumal 40.Selvi 41.P.Arumugam 42.Vijaya 43.Alagar Raja 44.Moorthy 45.P.Usharani 46.S.Anna Dhanam 47.M.Kannan 48.Muthukaruppan ..Defendants/Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2004 passed in A.S.No.100 of 2001 on the file of III Additional Subordinate Judge's Court, Madurai, reversing the judgment and decree dated

16.08.2000 passed in O.S.No.50 of 1992 on the file of District Munsif Judge's Court, Thirumangalam.

For Appellants : Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.D.Sachikumar Additional Government Pleader For R-21 : Mr.M.Suresh For R-3 to R-20 & : No appearance R-22 to R-48

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that the prayer sought for in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the same, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. 18.01.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm

To 1.The III Additional Sub Court, Madurai.

2.The District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

Lm 18.01.2024