Madras High CourtAS(MD)/42/2013dismissed for default

A.Veeramani, v. Kannagi @ Chinnathal,

2022-07-04Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN A.S(MD)No.42 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 A.Veeramani :Appellants/Ist Defendant .vs.

1.Kannagi @ Chinnathal 2.K.Mutharasu 3.K.Jayaraj 4.K.Saravanan :Respondents 1 to 4/Plaintiffs 5.K.Rajagopal 6.K.Sankar :Respondents 5 & 6/Defendants 2 and 3 PRAYER: First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.12 of 2010, dated 27.12.2012, on the file of Ist Additional District Judge(PCR Court),Thanjavur.

For Appellant :Mr.G.Karnan 1/4

For Respondent-1 :Dismissed For Respondent-2 :Mr.K.Guhan

JUDGMENT

********* On the earlier occasion ie., on 22.6.2022, when the matter came up for hearing, it is stated that some of the respondents died and the appellant is directed to take steps. When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has not given any particulars and that he is not interested in prosecuting the appeal by impleading the legal representatives of the deceased respondents 2 and 6. They are none other than the co-parcenors and they are also kith and kins. Therefore, the appellant cannot say that the respondents have not given the particulars of the legal representatives of the deceased respondents 2 and 6. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter any further.

respondents 2 and 6. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

04.07.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn To 1.The Ist Additional District Judge(PCR Court), Thanjavur.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

P.VELMURUGAN.,J.

vsn JUDGMENT MADE IN A.S(MD)No.42 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 04.07.2022 4/4