T.S.Janarthanan v. The Managing Director
W.P.(MD) No.120 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P.(MD) No.120 of 2020 T.S.Janarthanan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., TNSTC Head Office, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam - 612 001.
2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 02.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay 6% interest on the delayed payment of retirement benefits paid t o the petitioner, in view of the petitioner's representation dated 20.11.2019.
For petitioner : Mr.SP.Vijay Nivas For respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman
O R D E R
By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2.The petitioner's retirement benefits were settled belatedly in the month of September, 2019 and in view of such belated settlement, the present writ petition has been filed seeking for interest on the belated payment of the terminal benefits.
3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that in an identical cases, a batch of writ petitions entertained by this Court and directions have been issued to the respondents to pay the interest at the rate of 6% on the belated payment of the terminal benefits. This Court does not intend to deviate from the said procedure.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P.(MD) No.120 of 2020
4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that in view of the financial burden cast on the respondents Corporation, they may be permitted to pay the interest on the belated payment in a liberal monthly installments.
5. I am not in agreement with the said representation made. There was already a duty cast on the respondents Corporation to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself and the very fact that the belated disbursement of retirement benefit, had already put the retired employee to serious prejudice, entertaining the present request for disbursement of the interest on the belated payment in installments, could cause further prejudice to the retired employees.
6. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondents Corporation to pay the penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits for the period from the date of the retirement, till the date of actual disbursement, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. This Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) gcg +1 CC to M/s.SP.VIJAYNIVAS, Advocate ( SR-306[F] dated 06/01/2020 ) +1 CC to M/s.D.SIVARAMAN, Advocate ( SR-471[F] dated 07/01/2020 ) W.P.(MD) No.120 of 2020 06.01.2020 kg(CO) TR(22.01.2020)2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2