B.Govindan v. Ponmudi
Cont P.(MD).No.21 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Cont P.(MD).No.21 of 2021 B.Govindan ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.
1.Shri.Ponmudi, The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
2.Shri.Rajmohan, The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Periyamilaguparai, Trichy.
.. Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act 1971, to punish the contemnors/respondents in accordance with law for their wilful disobedience of the order in W.P.(MD). No.17997 of 2019, dated 27.02.2020.
PRAYER in W.P.(MD).No.17997 of 2019:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this this court to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the action of 2nd and 3rd respondents which having been recovered a sum of Rs.71,078/- towards non-implementable punishment of increment cut imposed on the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to refund the said recovered amount of Rs.71,078/- to the Petitioner and grant enhanced pension and other retiral benefits together with 6% interest payable to him with effect from 30.06.2016 within the stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman Standing Counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Cont P.(MD).No.21 of 2021
O R D E R
Recording the submission of the learned Standing counsel for the respondents that the order of the writ Court has been complied with by the respondents, on 19.02.2021, the contempt stands closed, since the disobedience alleged is not wilful. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Writs) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.
+1 CC to M/s.D.SIVARAMAN, Advocate ( SR-7676[F] dated 26/02/2021 ) Cont P.(MD).No.21 of 2021 25.02.2021 SSS(CO) TR(27.04.2021) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2