Ramalingam v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
CRL OP(MD). No.43 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/01/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD). No.43 of 2020
1. Ramalingam
2. Padmanaban ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.3&4 Vs State Rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, Mathur Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
(Cirme No.220/2019).
... Respondent For Petitioners : M/s. P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 220/2019 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.
2.The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C. and Section 21(4) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.220 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
3.The quantity involved is three units of river sand. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners undertakes that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.45,000/- (Rupees Forty Five https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
CRL OP(MD). No.43 of 2020 Thousand Only) as non-refundable deposit to the concerned District Mineral Foundation Trust.
4.Recording the said undertaking given by the petitioners' counsel, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur, Pudukkottai District, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.
5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.
sd/- 06/01/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHUR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
5. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
+1 CC to M/s.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN, Advocate ( SR-225[I] dated 06/01/2020 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.43 of 2020 Date :06/01/2020 SJI TE/VR/SAR-II : 09/01/2020 : 2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2