Karuthapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18557 of 2018 1 KARUTHAPANDI 2 LAKSHMANAN 3 RANJITHAM 4 INDRA 5 NEETHIRAJAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED(RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOUTH ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI.

(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.S.SATHIYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.M.ASOKAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant, enquiry has been conducted and the same is closed. Recording the same, this criminal original petition is closed. sd/- 24/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOUTH ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.SATHIYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate SR.No.20150 PS/RR/SAR-1:29/10/2018:2P/4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18557 of 2018 Date :24/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/