Papanasam Town Panchayat v. Abdul Samathu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.11.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Papanasam Town Panchayat, Represented by its Executive Officer, Papanasam. ... Appellant/Respondent/Defendant Vs.

Abdul Samathu ... Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree of the in A.S.No. 136 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam, dated 25.04.2006 against the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.31 of 2003 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam, dated 19.10.2004.

For Appellant : Mr.V.Chandrasekar For Respondent : Mr.T.R.Subramanian

JUDGMENT

On 04.11.2024, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it was submitted by the respondent that the entire tax has been settled. On that 1/3

ground, the counsel on record for the appellant was directed to get instructions and inform the Court. In spite of specific direction, the appellant has not get any instructions. In view of the submission made by the respondent's counsel, this second appeal has become infructuous. 2.Accordingly, this second appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

20.11.2024 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No TM To 1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam. 2.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam. 3.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

2/3

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

TM 20.11.2024 3/3