Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1632/2012dismissed as infructuous

Vinatha v. Minor.Durka

2020-11-09Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1632 of 2012 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09.11.2020 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1632 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012 Vinatha ... Petitioner / 5th Opposite Party/ 5th Opposite Party .vs.

1.Durka(Minor) Rep. by her father & Next friend Kuppuraj ...1st Respondent/Petitioner / Complainant 2.Sri Ganga Motors, Rep.. through its Partner, M.Durairaj 3.Durairaj(died)) 4.Suruli Sikkaiyya 5.Amutha .. 2 to 5 respondents/ 1 to 4 opposite parties/ 1 to 4 opposite parties 6.Vellathal 7.D.Senthilkumar 8.M.Mala (Respondents 6 to 8 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased 3rd respondent, vide Court order dated 09.12.2016 in CMP(MD)Nos.1335 to 1337/2016 in CRP(MD)No.1632/2012) Prayer:-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 07.08.2008 passed in E.A.No.58 of 2008 in C.C.No.146 of 2007 on the file of the District Consumer Redressal Forum, Theni.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Nallathambi For R-5 to R-8 : Mr.P.Muthuvijayapandian

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner, against the order dated 07.08.2008 passed in E.A.No.58 of 2008 in C.C.No.146 of 2007 on the file of the District Consumer Redressal Forum, Theni.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1632 of 2012

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 5 to 8.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions would submit that the matter has been settled out of Court.

4. Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pm Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The District Consumer Redressal Forum, Theni.

2.The Record Keeper-2 copies Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1632 of 2012 09.11.2020 KMV(CO) KM (26.11.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2