Madras High CourtCRL RC(MD)/699/2010closed

Nagasubramanian v. N.Thirumal Alagu

2019-07-10Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL RC (MD)No.699 of 2010 Nagasubramanian ... Petitioner/Respondent/ Complainant Vs.

1. N.Thirumal Alagu ... 1st Respondent/Appellant/ 3rd Accused

2. State, through the Public Prosecutor Madurai.

... 2nd Respondent/Respondent/ Respondent Prayer : This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in C.A No.30 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Madurai dated 29.07.2010 acquitting the accused by setting aside the Judgment in C.C.No.6 of 2005 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Madurai dated 08.01.2010 and set aside the Judgment passed in C.A No.30 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Madurai dated 29.07.2010.

For Petitioner : Mr.Sasikumar for Mr.B.Tamilnidhi For Respondent : Mrs.S.Bharathi, Government Advocate (crl.side)for R2 Mr.C.Muthu Saravanan for R1

ORDER

Questioning the judgment of acquittal dated 29.07.2010 made in Crl.A No.30 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Madurai, the complainant had filed this criminal revision case. 2.The revision petitioner is a school teacher. The first respondent was a police official during the relevant time. After hearing the learned counsel on either side, this Court suggested that the issue can be given a quietus if the first respondent gracefully expresses his apology to the revision petitioner and also pays a sum of Rs.25,000/- as compensation. The suggestion made by this Court was accepted by the first respondent who is presently abroad. Over phone, he contacted the revision petitioner and he had conveyed his sincere regret for the unfortunate incident that occurred on 09.08.2004.

The revision petitioner appreciating the sentiments of the first respondent has decided to give a closure to this issue. The revision petitioner had also sent a mail to the first respondent in this regard. The first respondent's counsel states that a sum of Rs.25,000/- will be taken as a Demand Draft in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

favour of the revision petitioner and handed over to the petitioner's counsel within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the first respondent, this criminal revision case is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To 1.The Principal Sessions Court, Madurai.

2.The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Madurai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+2 CC to MR.B.TAMILNIDHI, Advocate ( SR-74820[F] dated 11/07/2019 ) CRL RC (MD)No.699 of 2010 10.07.2019 SKM MK (06.08.2019) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/