Ganesan v. Sivaraj,

C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1829 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.08.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1829 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011 Ganesan .. Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.

Sivaraj .. Respondent/Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order passed in I.A.No.52 of 2010 in R.C.O.P.No.4 of 2005, dated 30.11.2010 on the file of the Rent Control Tribunal (Principal District Munsif Court), Ambasamudram. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondent : No Appearance

ORDER

It is submitted that the tenant in the R.C.O.P.No.4 of 2005 on the file of the Rent Controller, Ambasamudram, is the revision petitioner.

2.The revision petition has been filed against the order in the I.A.No.52 of 2010 in R.C.O.P.No.4 of 2005, on the file of the Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif Court), Ambasamudram, dimissing the petition filed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the Rent Control Original Petition itself was disposed of. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition and the revision petition has became infructuous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1829 of 2011 4.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To 1.The Principal District Munsif, Rent Control Tribunal, Ambasamudram.

2.The Section Officer, E.R/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate SR-83101.

C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1829 of 2011 CS(16.09.2019) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2