Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1831/2011dismissed as infructuous

M.Rajaguru v. P.Soundarapandian

2019-09-19Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha1 pages

CRP(MD) Nos.1831 and 1832 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.09.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P.(PD)Nos.1831 and 1832 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 in C.R.P.(PD)Nos.1831 of 2011 In both revisions:

M.Rajaguru ... Petitioner/Respondent/Defendant in both petitions Vs.

1.P.Soundarapandian 2.D.Mohan 3.D.Natarajan ... Respondents/Petitioners/Plaintiffs in both petitions PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Section 227 of Constitution of India against the order dated 02.12.2010 made in I.A.Nos.1763 and 1764 of 2009 in O.S.No.187 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur town. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohan For R1 : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu For R2 & R3 : No appearance C O M M O N O R D E R It is represented that the suit itself has been dismissed for default and as such the Civil Revision Petitions have become infructuous. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to revive the petitions as and when the suit is restored to file. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) CM To The Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur. +1CC TO MR.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ, Advocate Sr. No. 88695 C.R.P.(PD)Nos.1831 and 1832 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 19.09.2019 KG(CO) TR(16.10.2019) 1P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.