Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1882/2011dismissed as infructuous

S.Senthamarai v. U.A.Ramantha Pillai

2019-08-22Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar2 pages

C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1882 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1882 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 1.S.Senthamarai 2.M.Sivasurya 3.O.Alagu Lalitha represented by their Power Agent R.S.Murugesan :Petitioners vs.

1.U.A.Ramanatha Pillai 2.R.Arul Murugan 3.R.Sathyaseela 4.A.Shanthi 5.N.Vaiyapuri 6.M.Rajasekaran 7.Manickam Pillai 8.Mani @ Palanichamy 9.Rajeswari 10.Mariammal 11.Rathinagirija 12.Kalai 13.Thilagavathy 14.Sundhararaj 15.Ambika 16.A.Raja :Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and ex order dated 20.06.2011 passed in I.A.No.232 of 2011 in O.S.No.20 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Periyakulam.

For Petitioners :Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan For R1 and R3 :Mr.M.Saravanan For R16 :Mr.M.Chockalingam For R2, R4 to R15 :No Appearance

ORDER

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayer sought for in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1882 of 2011 the revision petition has become infructuous and submitted that the revision petition may be dismissed as infructuous. The learned Counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl. Side) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Periyakulam.

+1 CC to M/s.R. SUBRAMANIAN, Advocate ( SR-83247[F] dated 26/08/2019 ) C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1882 of 2011 cmr JM/06.09.2019/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2