Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2262/2010dismissed for nonprosecution

Santhalakshmi v. Subbulakshmi

2019-07-23Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.07.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR C.R.P.(MD)(NPD)Nos.2262 and 2263 of 2010 1.Santhalakshmi 2.Mahalakshmi 3.Venkatasubramanian :Petitioners/Appellants/ Respondents 2 to 4/ Landlords in both cases vs.

Subbulakshmi :Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner/ Tenant in both cases PRAYER in C.R.P(MD)No.2262 of 2010: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.09.2010 passed in R.C.A.No.23 of 2010 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Court), Tirunelveli confirming the fair and decreel order dated 05.02.2010 in R.C.O.P.No.80 of 2006 on the file of the Rent Controller (I Additional District Munsif Court), Tirunelveli. PRAYER in C.R.P(MD)No.2263 of 2010: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.09.2010 passed in R.C.A.No.

24 of 2010 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Court), Tirunelveli confirming the fair and decreel order dated 05.02.2010 in R.C.O.P.No.94 of 2006 on the file of the Rent Controller (I Additional District Munsif Court), Tirunelveli. For Petitioners :Mr.J.Ashok for M/s.Jayapaul Associates (in both cases) For R1 :Mr.S.P.Maharajan (in both cases) COMMON ORDER https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ C.R.P.(MD)No.

under Section 8(5) of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, for depositing the rent in Court. 2.C.R.P.(MD)No.2263 of 2010 has also been filed by the landlords of the premises as against the order dismissing the petition for eviction filed by them.

3.When the matters are taken up for hearing today, the learned Counsel on either side report that they are unable to contact their clients. They also pointed out that notice sent to them was returned.

4.In view of the fact that the petitioners and respondent are not responding, this Court presume that the parties are not interested or there is settlement between the parties. Hence, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge), Tirunelveli.

2.The Rent Controller (I Additional District Munsif), Tirunelveli.

C.R.P.(MD)(NPD)Nos.2262 and 2263 of 2010 23.07.2019 cmr JMN(30.08.2019) 2P : 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/