Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2414/2010dismissed for nonprosecution

Sridhar v. Alexander Peeriz

2021-07-20Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran2 pages

CRP(PD)(MD)No.2414 of 2010 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :20.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN CRP(PD)(MD)No.2414 of 2010 1.Sridhar 2.Selvaraj ... Petitioners 18 & 19/ Defendants 32 & 33 -vs1.Alexander Peeriz 2.Eldin Peeriz 3.Levin Peeriz 4.Martin Peeriz 5.Mejal 6.Mestida 7.Rita Boobalarayee Ammal 8.Suguna Peeriz 9.Ieo Peeriz 10.Merinda Perriz 11.Britotolin Fernando 12.Petricia Peerix 13.Selvi 14.Suthersan 15.Benjamin Rotrigo 16.Vadamalai Pandian 17.Santha Ammal 18.Kodeeswaran 19.Esakimuthu 20.Rita Peeriz 21.Peter Ammal(Died) 22.Meridian Peeriz 23.Judan Peeriz 24.Theodar Peeriz 25.Murphy Peeriz 26.Meera Peeriz ... Respondents [R22 to R26 are brought on record as LRs of deceased R21 vide order dated 19.09.2019 in MP(MD)No.1 of 2014] PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 07.09.2010 made in I.A.No.260 of 2010 in O.S.No.15 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRP(PD)(MD)No.2414 of 2010 For Petitioners : No appearance R1 to R19 : Given up R20 & R21 : Died For R22 to R26 : No appearance

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.07.2021, there was no representation for the petitioners and therefore, the case was directed to be listed today (20.07.2021) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for petitioners. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cp/msa To:

The Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur. CRP(PD)(MD)No.2414 of 2010 20.07.2021 RC (30.07.2021)2P-2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2