Arumugam v. Periyasami

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.07.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.Arumugam 2.Maruthai 3.Karivandan 4.Pallamuthu 5.Palaniappan ... Defendants 1 to 5/Appellants Appellants Vs.

1.Periyasami 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the District Collector, Karur Collectorate, Karur.

3.The Tahsildar, Kulithalai Taluk, Kulithalai.

... Plaintiff & Defendants 6 to 7/ Respondents/Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai, dated 31.07.2008 in A.S.No.5 of 2008 1/4

confirming the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Kulithalai, dated 31.07.2007 in O.S.No.20 of 2004 and to dismiss the said suit.

For Appellants : No appearance For R-1 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For R-2 & R-3 : Mr.SRA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader

JUDGMENT

When the Second Appeal was taken up for hearing on 16.07.2024, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant filed a Memo reporting 'No instruction'. Recording the same, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption 'For Dismissal' by printing the names of the appellants.

2. Today, the Second Appeal is listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' by printing the names of the appellants. Even today, there is no representation for the appellants.

3. The learned Counsel for the respondent is present. 2/4

4. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.07.2024 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes BTR To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai.

2.The District Munsif, Kulithalai.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Record Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4.The District Collector, State of Tamil Nadu, Karur Collectorate, Karur.

5.The Tahsildar, Kulithalai Taluk, Kulithalai.

3/4

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

BTR Judgment made in Dated:

18.07.2024 4/4