S.Natarajan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/01/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR S.Natarajan ... Petitioner/Accused(Rank Not Known) Vs State through The Inspector of Police, Koodakkovil Police Station, Thirumangalam Sub-Division, Madurai District.

(Crime No.1024 of 2020).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.L.Prabhu, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.1024 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as Accused No.Rank Not Known, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 379 of I.P.C., r/w under Section 21(5) of Tamilnadu Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and under Section 9(B)(1)(b) of Indian Explosives Act, 1994, in Crime No.1024 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused were said to have illegally transported explosive items and lime stones without any valid permission. Hence, a complaint has been registered.

1/3

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedent. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner shall draw a demand draft in favour of Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. The petitioner shall produce the proof of remittance /submission of Demand Draft to Dean while executing sureties. On acknowledgment of the same by the Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

2/3

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 19/01/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI. 2.-DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODAKKOVIL POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM SUB-DIVISION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO: THE DEAN, GOVERNMENT RAJAJI HOSPITAL, MADURAI. +1 CC to Mr.L.PRABHU, Advocate ( SR-370[I] dated 21/01/2021 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.226 of 2021 Date :19/01/2021 vsg MS/PN/SAR-I (29/01/2021) 3P / 7C 3/3