Albert v. Palayyan

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.02.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRP(MD).No.623 of 2011(NPD) Albert ... Petitioner/4th Petitioner/4th Plaintiff Vs.

1.Palayyan (died) ... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/ 1st Defendant 2.Kanakaraj 3.Nesammal D/o.Chellian 4.Harris (died) 5.Nesammal W/o.Harris 6.Dhas 7.Palas 8.Gangatharan 9.Krishnan 10.Selvaraj (died) 11.Harris (died) 12.Gnanakkon 13.Mohammed Haneeba (died) 14.Rajammal 15.Thai 16.Rajamony 17.Pushparaj 18.Selvaraj 19.Kanakabai 20.Glory 21.Pathummal ... Respondents 2 to 21/ 1/4

Respondents 2 to 21/Defendants 2 to 21 22.Charles 23.John Rose 24.Mercy 25.Selvest Rubi 26.Rubi ... Respondents 22 to 29/ Respondents 22 to 29/Not ranked in the suit 27.Johnson 28.Mohanan @ Chrishtudas 29.Selvaraj 30.Asirvatham Nadar (died) 31.Amirthabai 32.Ananthabai 33.Absal 34.Amala Pushpam 35.Amalraj 36.Anitha Kumari .. Respondents 30 to 36/Petitioners 1 to 3,5 to 8/Plaintiffs 1 to 3, 5 to 8 PRAYER : Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai to dispose the Execution Petition No.118 of 2001 in O.S.No.53 of 1996 within a time that may be stipulated by this Court and submit a report before this Court for complying the order of this Court. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaprabha for Mr.K.Sreekumaran Nair (for R2 & R3) 2/4

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing yesterday i.e, 02.02.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter is listed today (i.e., 03.02.2023) under the caption for dismissal. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

03.02.2023 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No Rmk To 1.The District Munsif, Kuzhithurai.

3/4

R.

VIJAYAKUMAR ,J., Rmk Order made in CRP(MD).No.623 of 2011(NPD) Dated:

03.02.2023 4/4