Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2585/2012dismissed as infructuous

K. Nallasamy v. V.M. Moosa

2020-10-16Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.2585 of 2012 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16.10.2020 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.2585 of 2012 Mr.K.Nallasamy ... Petitioner / 3rd Party Auction Purchaser/ 3rd respondent .vs.

1.Mr.V.M.Moosa 2.Mr.P.Velmurugan 3.Mr.N.A.Velu 4.Mrs.Chinnaponnu 5.Mr.R.Jeyaraj ... Respondents 1 to 5/3rd parties / claimants 6.Mr.Sayyid Muhammed ... 6th respondent / Petitioner / 1st respondent 7.D.D.No.670, Vadamadurai Block, Agro Engineering & Service Cooperative Centre, through its Special Officer. ... 7th respondent / petitioner / 2nd respondent Prayer:-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to pass an order directing the Additional District Munsif Court, Dindigul, to dispose of E.A.No.30 of 2011 in E.P.No.202 of 2005, within a specific time frame in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar, for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For RR1,2, 4 & 6 : No Appearance (R-3, R-5, R-7 -Dismissed)

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner, to direct the Additional District Munsif, Dindigul, to dispose of E.A.No.30 of 2011 in E.P.No.202 of 2005, within a specific time frame in accordance with law.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

3. There is no representation on behalf of the respondents 1,2,4 & 6 either in person or through counsel. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.2585 of 2012

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions would submit that the matter has become infructuous.

5. Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) am Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The Additional District Munsif, Dindigul.

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.(2 Copies) C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.2585 of 2012 16.10.2020 SSS(CO) NR (03/11/2020) 2P : 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2