Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1074/2013dismissed as infructuous

Thiramani v. The Returning Officer Cum

2020-02-18Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian2 pages

C.R.P.(MD)No.1074 of 2013(NPD) BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :18.02.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.R.P.(MD)No.1074 of 2013(NPD) and C.R.P(MD)No.770 of 2013(NPD) and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 C.R.P(MD)No.1074 of 2013 (NPD) Thiramani .. Petitioner/Petitioner vs.

1.The Returning Officer cum Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Valliyoor,Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

2.Persiyal 3.Indira 4.Jayalakshmi 5.The State of Tamilnadu, Through its District Collector, Tirunelveli District,Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli-627 009.

.. Respondents 1 to 5/ Respondents 1 to 5 Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in E.O.P.No.6 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli dated 01.04.2013 in so far as the same rejecting the prayer for recounting.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balaji For R1 & R5 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah For R2 : Mr.R.Manimaran For R3 & R4 : No appearance C.R.P(MD)No.770 of 2013 (NPD) Persiyal .. Petitioner/2nd respondent vs.

1.Thiramani 2.The Returning Officer cum Commissioner of Panchayat Union, Valliyoor, Having its Officer at Valliyoor, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

3.Indira 4.Jeyalaxmi https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P.(MD)No.1074 of 2013(NPD) 5.The State of Tamilnadu, Through its District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli-627 009.

.. 2 to 5 Respondents/ 1,3 to 5 Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to allow the civil revision petition by setting aside the Order passed in Election O.P.No.6 of 2011 dated 01.04.2013 on the file of the I Additional District Court, Tirunelveli.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Manimaran For R1 : Mr.V.Balaji For R2 & R5 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah For R3 & R4 : No appearance COMMON ORDER The dispute in these Civil Revision Petitions is relates to challenge to the election that was held in the year 2011. Now the period of office is over and fresh election has already been completed, nothing survives in these Civil Revision Petitions and hence, both the Civil Revision Petitions have become infructuous.

2. In view of the above, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) am To The I Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli.

+1 CC to M/s.V.BALAJI, Advocate ( SR-7140[F] dated 19/02/2020 ) +1CC TO SPL.GP. Sr.No.7287 C.R.P.(MD)No.1074 of 2013(NPD) and C.R.P(MD)No.770 of 2013(NPD) 18.02.2020 SMA/27/02/2020/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2