← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/130/2026granted

Revathi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pavoorchatram

2026-01-07Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy7 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

1. Revathi

2. Gugan @ Jeyaguhan

3. Jeyaraj ... Petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Pavoorchatram Police Station, Tenkasi District, Crime No.434/2024 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.R.Ponkarthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/7

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.434 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC (316(2) and 318(4) of BNS), in Crime No.434 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the first accused was running Akshaya Gold Finance, where the defacto complainant pledged his gold ornaments on various dates and obtained gold loans. Subsequently, the defacto complainant came to know that the accused had closed the business at Alangulam, and he realized that he had been cheated by the accused. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any 2/7

offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide any condition imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the accused cheated the defacto complainant after receiving his pledged gold ornaments worth about Rs.15,00,000/-. Therefore, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner are ready to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/-, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, on condition 3/7

that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

(a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), to the credit of Crime No.434 of 2024 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi. After receipt of entire amount, the learned Judicial Magistrate, shall deposit the said amount in an interest bearing Fixed Deposit in any Nationalized Bank initially for a period of one year and renew them periodically until the final order/Judgment is passed in the case in Crime No.434 of 2024. The learned Judicial Magistrate or Trial Court shall pass orders regarding entitlement of the said amount in its final order/Judgment.

(c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders; 4/7

(d) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.

(S S Y J) 07.01.2026 jbr 5/7

TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi.

2. The Inspector of Police, Pavoorchatram Police Station, Tenkasi District,

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

6/7

S.SRIMATHY,J jbr

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.130 of 2026 Date : 07/01/2026 7/7