Thottha Veeran v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.10090 of 2015 1 THOTTHA VEERAN 2 MONDICHAMY ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs.
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DIST.
(IN CRIME NO. 396 OF 2015) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SURESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.396 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused have fabricated the document to grab the property of the defacto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that accused Nos.3 and 4 in this case were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.9708 of 2015, on 03.06.2015.
The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners have appeared before the respondent and also produced the proof for cancellation of the sale deed. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the accused 1 and 2 are not the owners of the property in Survey No.215/3. They have sold the same to the accused 3 and 4 without any right. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District, on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 6.00 p.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 08/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DIST. +1. CC to M/S.R.Karunanidhi, Advocate SR.No.23397 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10090 of 2015 Date :08/06/2015 PBK/AMF 15/06/2015 ::2P-6C::
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/