Venkatraman Naiyakar, v. S.Kesavan(41/12)

C.R.P.(MD)No.1518 of 2013(PD) BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24.02.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.R.P.(MD)No.1518 of 2013(PD) and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 1.Venkatraman Naiyakar 2.Subburaman .. Petitioners/Respondents/ Defendants vs.

1.S.Kesavan 2.Ka.Selvaraj 3.Ka.Muniappan @ Kutty 4.Ka.Navaneetha Balakrishnan 5.M.Kulaba @ Venkatraman Ka.Dharmar @ Subayya (Died) 6.Ka.Balakrishnan 7.Ka.Seenivasan @ Kasiperumal 8.V.Subbayya 9.Papa @ Kasi Thiruvenkada Subulakshmi 10.Bala 11.Jothi 12.P.Kasirajan 13.C.Selvaraj 14.S.Perumal Naicker 15.C.Palraj .. Respondents/Respondents/ Plaintiffs 1 to 5 and 7 to 16 Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 18.07.2013 in I.A.No.81 of 2012 in O.S.No.47 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Thoothukudi and set aside the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For R1,R2,R4 R7 to R11 & R15 : Dismissed For R3 : No appearance For R6 & R12 to R14 : Mr.M.P.Senthil For R5 : Mr.V.Maragathavel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P.(MD)No.1518 of 2013(PD)

ORDER

Challenge in this Civil Revision Petition is order dismissing the application to recall the witnesses. It is now stated that the original suit itself has been disposed of and hence, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the said statement, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) am To The II Additional District Court, Thoothukudi.

+1 CC to Mr.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate ( SR-8331[F] dated 26/02/2020 ) C.R.P.(MD)No.1518 of 2013(PD) 24.02.2020 MK (03.03.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2