Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9512/2008dismissed as infructuous

P.Thangakalyani, v. The District Collector,

2020-10-16Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.9512 of 2008 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)No.9512 of 2008 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2008 P.Thangakalyani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Madurai.

2.The Assistant Commissioner Prohibition and Excise, Madurai.

3.The Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Kappalur, Madurai.

4.P.Rajasekar ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.10.08 based on the proceedings of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.1607/08/A1 dated 08.09.2008.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anand Kumar For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.C.Ramesh, Special Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has now become infructuous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.9512 of 2008 2.Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The District Collector Madurai.

2.The Assistant Commissioner Prohibition and Excise, Madurai.

W.P.(MD)No.9512 of 2008 16.10.2020 NR (21/12/2020) 2P : 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2