Arulappan v. The District Collector

W.P.(MD)No.230 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD)No.230 of 2022 Arulappan ... Petitioner vs.

1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Tahsildar, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 04.12.2021.

For Petitioner :Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran For Respondents :Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate *****

O R D E R

Let met not hold on to the Writ Petition any further, since it is informed by Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran, learned Counsel for the petitioner that he had in turn informed by Mr.S.Kameswaran, learned Government Advocate for the respondent that the Tahsildar, Manamelkudi, Pudukottai District, had issued a notice to the petitioner that his land holdings are surplus. Naturally, the petitioner will have to question that particular notice/proceedings/order in manner known to law. 2.In view of that particular development, there need not any adjudication in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, without entering into any merits, the present Writ Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to question the order of the Tahsildar, Manamelkudi, by filing an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T & P) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cmr https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.230 of 2022 To 1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Tahsildar, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi. +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-1714[F] dated 19/01/2022 ) Order made in W.P.(MD)No.230 of 2022 12.01.2022 nsn(CO) TR(03.02.2022) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2