Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/210/2020granted

Rajiv Gandhi v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-01-08Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.210 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/01/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD). No.210 of 2020

1. Rajiv Gandhi

2. Manirajan ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 3 Vs The State:

Rep.by Inspector of Police, Kenikarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District , Crime No.452 of 2019. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.K.Sathishkumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mrs.M.Ananthadevi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.452 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioners are in custody since 04.12.2019 for the offences punishable under sections 120(b), 465, 467, 468, 171 and 420 of I.P.C., in Crime No.452 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police. They seek bail.

3.The case of the prosecution is that bogus certificates were fabricated for the purpose of securing public employment fraudulently. The petitioners are said to be the parties to it. 4.The police custody were also taken. Their further incarceration is not going to serve any purpose. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.210 of 2020

5. In view of the above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions;

(i) the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only)each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram .

(ii) the petitioners are directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required for the interrogation. (iii) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 08/01/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, RAMANATHAPURAM. 2 -DO-THRO- THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, RAMANATHAPURAM.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KENIKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.K.SATHISH KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-395 dated 08/01/2020 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.210 of 2020 Date :08/01/2020 rmi ES/PN/SAR 2/08.01.2020/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2