The Director Of Elementary v. A.Chitra

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH and M.P(MD) No.2 of 2012 1.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai-6.

2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

4.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

... Review Petitioners in both review applications Vs.

1.A.Chitra

2.B.Balamani 3.D.Kristiyana Dhanaseeli 4.P.Albert James 5.M.Suriyakala 6.G.Bharathi 7.M.Latha 8.M.Ulagamatha 9.K.Murugeswari

10. R.Thamaraiselvi 11.Arumugam ....Respondents in Rev.Aplc.(MD)No.66 of 2012 1.R.Thamaraiselvi 2.B.Balamani 3.D.Kristiyana Dhanaseeli 4.P.Albert James 5.M.Suriyakala 6.G.Bharathi 7.M.Latha 8.M.Ulagamatha 9.K.Murugeswari ....Respondents in Rev.Aplc.(MD)No.67 of 2012

COMMON PRAYER: Review Applications filed under Order XLVII, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the common order dated 01.03.2011 made in W.A.(MD).Nos.116 & 117 of 2011, respectively.

In both cases For Petitioners : Mr.D.Sasikumar, Additional Government Pleader For 1st Respondent : Mr.M.Saravanan COMMON ORDER J. NISHA BANU, J.

AND N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

We do not find any error apparent on the face of the common order, dated 01.03.2011 passed in W.A.(MD).Nos.116 & 117 of 2011 and the Division Bench has come to the conclusion that the guidelines or instructions cannot over ride the Rules and this finding does not suffer from any infirmity.

2. In view of the same, these review applications are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[J.N.B., J.] [N.A.V., J.] 12.10.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rm

J. NISHA BANU, J.

AND N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

rm 12.10.2022