Seenivasan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.10178 of 2015 1 SEENIVASAN 2 VIJAYALAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.2 & 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DIST.

CRIME NO. 10 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.VINOTH SINGH MISRA Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.10 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 498(A) and 406 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act., and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.According to the defacto complainant, the accused have demanded 30 sovereigns of gold jewels and harassed the defacto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this Case and as per the direction, they appeared before the mediation and conciliation centre at Madurai, but the defacto complainant did not turn up.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side). 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sattur, Virudhunagar District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRCT.

2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRARE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DIST.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

5.

THE CHIEF COORDINATOR, MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.VINOTH SINGH MISRA Advocate SR.No.50073

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10178 of 2015 Date :28/08/2015 GJM/NGM/SS/SARII-1.9.15-2P-7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/