Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1021/2015allowed

Vijayaram v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-01-22Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.01.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1021 of 2015 1.Vijayaram 2.Latheef ... Petitioners /A1 and A2 -Vs1.The State, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Devakottai Town Police Station, Sivagangai District.

... 1st Respondent / Complainant *(Crime No.693/2014) 2.M.Saravanan ... 2nd Respondent / Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to FIR in Crime No.693 of 2014 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Devakottai Town Police Station, Sivagangai District and quash the same. For petitioner : Mr.S.Sathya Chidambaram For Respondent-1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed praying to call for the records pertaining to FIR in Crime No.693 of 2014 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Devakottai Town Police Station, Sivagangai District and quash the same.

2. On a complaint given by the 2nd respondent / defacto complainant, the 1st respondent, after investigation, has registered a case in Crime No.693 of 2014 against the petitioners/Accused, for the offences under Sections 342, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC.,

3. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that charge sheet has already been filed before the concerned Jurisdictional Magistrate and the same is yet to be taken on file.

4. The 2nd respondent / defacto complainant as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a compromise memo stating that the matter in issue between them has been amicably resolved and therefore, the 2nd respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case.

5. The Court has also heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. In the light of the said compromise memo, no purpose will be served by keeping the Criminal Original Petition pending.

7. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceeding in Crime No.693 of 2014 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Devakottai Town Police Station, Sivagangai District and the charge sheet filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate, which is yet to be taken on file, are quashed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To (Corrected order issued) 1.The Inspector of Police, Devakottai Town Police Station, Sivagangai District.

2. The Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to MR.S.SATHIYA CHIDAMBARAM, ADVOCATE IN SR : 2953 Mpk SR : 23.02.2015 : 2p/5c SR : 24.03.2015 : 2P/5C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1021 of 2015 22.01.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/