Thangamuniyandi.K v. The District Revenue Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.Thangamuniyandi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal, dated 06.08.2021, filed by the petitioner for rectifying the UDR mistake in respect of the property situated in S.No.611, Senkottai revenue village, Virudhunagar taluk and District, measuring an extent of 1 Acre 84 cents.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.Satish For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Government Pleader 1/4

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. All that the petitioner wants is to dispose of the petition mentioned appeal. No exception can be taken to the said request. The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned appeal on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The interested parties will have to be necessarily heard before the final order is passed. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the first respondent to pass order one way or the other. The writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

20.01.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Btr 2/4

To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

Btr 20.01.2023 4/4