Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2299/2013disposed of

R.Vijayalakshmi, v. P.Sivasubramanian,

2020-01-13Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian2 pages

CRP(MD). No.2299 of 2013 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Friday, the Twelfth day of November Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA CRP(PD)(MD). No.2299 of 2013 AND MP(MD).No.1 of 2013 R.Vijayalakshmi, ...Appellant/1st Respondent/ Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs 1 P.Sivasubramanian, 2 S.Venkatesan, ... Respondents/Appellants/Respondents/ Defendants No.1,4 3 V.Shanmugam, ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent/ 2nd Defendant P.Manickam (Died) ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent/ 3rd Defendant Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 29.08.2013 and made in C.M.A.No.5 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Theni at Periyakulam.

ORDER:- This Revision Petition coming on for hearing on this day and upon perusing the earlier order dated 13.01.2020 of this Court and the requisition letter submitted by the Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam in Letter in D.No.436/2021, dated 29.09.2021, seeking six months time for disposal of the suits in O.S.No.97 of 2007, this Court made the following order:

This matter is listed today under the caption 'for extension of time' on the letter received from the The learned Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam, seeking extension of six months time to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.97 of 2007.

2.The learned Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam, in his letter dated 29.09.2021 stated that on 22.09.2021, when the suit was posted for cross examination of P.W.1, it was found that the entire records https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRP(MD). No.2299 of 2013 connected with I.A.No.01 of 2020 in O.S.No.99 of 2007, which had been forwarded to the Additional District Judge, Periyakulam for reference in C.M.A.No.05 of 2011, has not yet been returned back to the Sub Court, Periyakulam. Hence, the learned Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam, is directed to take emergent steps to get back the records.

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the reasons assigned by the learned Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam, this Court is inclined to extend the time as requested by the learned Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam, by six months and accordingly, it is extended by six months from the date of receipt of communication of this order from the Registry. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TO

1. The Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam.

Copy to:

The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai ORDER DATED : 12/11/2021 ==========================

ORDER

========================== CRP(MD). No.2299 of 2013 Giving direction and etc.

as stated within.

SS(CO) TR(09.12.2021) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2