Kandasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.10299 of 2015 1 KANDASAMY 2 RAMASAMY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOTTIAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT, (CRIME NO. 175 OF 2015). ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C in Crime No.175 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is alleged in the complaint that the petitioners and another assaulted the defacto complainant, threatened him with dire consequences and scolded him with filthy language. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners did not involve in this case as alleged by the prosecution and the petitioners are innocent persons.

4. The learned Government Advocate submitted that the victim sustained simple injury and injured had already been discharged from hospital.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and also perused the entire materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musiri, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 24/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MUSIRI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TRICHY 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOTTIAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate SR.No.33820

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10299 of 2015 Date :24/06/2015 AA/26.06.2015/2p- 6c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/