Mrs.Lakshmi Priya Nagendran v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fifteenth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.10345 of 2015 LAKSHMI PRIYA NAGENDRAN ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, KODAIKANAL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CR. NO. 426/2012.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.VEERARAGHAVAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is the sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 189, 294(b) and 341 of I.P.C., in Crime No.426 of 2012 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a widow and she is having two kids and she has been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the ingredients of the offences are not made out.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the case was registered based on the complaint given by the Advocate Commissioner appointed in O.S.No.181 of 2012 by the learned District Munsif, Kodaikanal and the offences are bailable and hence, the anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable.

4. Recording the same submission, the Petition is dismissed as not maintainable.

sd/- 15/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, KODAIKANAL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.S.VEERARAGHAVAN Advocate SR.No.31035 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10345 of 2015 Date :15/06/2015 PBK/AMF 17/06/2015 ::1P-4C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/