O.M.A.Udhuman Mydeen, v. Mr.Jainulavudeen, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board,
Cont.P(MD)Nos.238 and 239 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.10.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Cont.P(MD)Nos.238 and 239 of 2020 O.M.A.Udhuman Mydeen ... Petitioner in both petitions versus Mr.Jainulavudeen The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Sethakadai Street, Chennai.
... Contemnor in both petitions Cont.P.(MD)No.238 of 2020: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnor/respondent herein for his wilful, deliberate and disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.A.(MD)No.1468 of 2018 dated 14.11.2019 under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Cont.P.(MD)No.239 of 2020: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnor/respondent herein for his wilful, deliberate and disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.A.(MD)No.1707 of 2018 dated 14.11.2019 under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Prayer in WA(MD)No.1468 & 1707 of 2018: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.16615 of 2018 dated 30.08.2018. Prayer in WP(MD). 16615/ 2018 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records in connection with the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent vide his proceedings Ref.No.CHE.MU.AANAI.No.6211 / 12 / A1 / TVELI dated 05/07/20018, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to pass an order appointing as Muttavalli Kadayanallur Naina Mohammed Periya Kutba Palli Vasal till the disposal of A.S.No.1024/1993.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Cont.P(MD)Nos.238 and 239 of 2020 For Petitioner in both petitions : M/s.Niranjan S.Kumar For Respondent in both petitions : Mr.S.A.S.Alaudeen COMMON ORDER [Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN, J.] The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order has been complied with by the Wakf Board and hence, the Contempt Petitions may be closed. The learned counsel for the petitioner also undertakes to file a memo to that effect.
2. In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the submission made before this Court, both the Contempt Petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ogy Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To Mr.Jainulavudeen The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Sethakadai Street, Chennai.
Cont.P(MD)Nos.238 and 239 of 2020 15.10.2020 SE(CO) CS(05.11.2020) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/