Madras High CourtWP(MD)/11707/2010dismissed for default

K. Selvaraj, S/O.Karuppiah, v. The District Collector,

2019-10-01Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.11707 of 2010 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.10.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P.(MD)No.11707 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2010 K.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk, Rajapalayam.

3.The Commissioner, Rajapalayam Municipality, Rajapalayam.

4.S.Solaimalai 5.G.Ramasamy ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings Oo.Mu.No.1875/2010, dated 06.04.2010 and to quash the same and to direct the 2nd Respondent to issue patta in the name of the petitioner to the Land in Town Survey No.287/5. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr..Aayiram K.Selvakumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 and R.2 : Mr.S.Raja for Mr.K.M.Vijayakumar for R.3 : R.4 and R.5 - dismissed

ORDER

Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made yesterday (30.09.2019), which reads as follows: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.11707 of 2010 'The learned Counsel for the third respondent and learned State Counsel are before this Court, but, there is no representation for the writ petitioner. List the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 01.10.2019.'

2. Pursuant to aforesaid earlier proceedings made yesterday, instant writ petition is listed under the caption 'FOR DISMISSAL' today, however, the position is no different today, when the matter is called. In other words, Mr.S.Raja, learned Counsel for third respondent and State Counsel viz., Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 are before this Court, but there is no representation for writ petitioner. It is clear that writ petitioner is recalcitrant in pursuing this writ petition.

3. In the light of the above narrative, instant writ petition is dismissed for default / non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl. Side) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar SSL To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk, Rajapalayam.

3.The Commissioner, Rajapalayam Municipality, Rajapalayam.

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-91181[F] dated 03/10/2019 ) W.P.(MD)No.11707 of 2010 01.10.2019 JM/18.10.2019/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2