Syed Masook, v. N. Kumaran Sethupathy,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2021 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI in W.A.(MD) No.261 of 2021 and C.M.P.[MD]Nos.4578 & 4580 of 2021 Tiruchirappalli City Land Lease Merchants Welfare Association, Rep. by its Secretary, Mr.R.Rabindrakamak, No.148, West Bouleward Road, Trichy - 08.
...Review Applicant/ Respondent No.1 Vs.
1.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Tiruchirappalli.
...Respondent No.1/
Writ Appellant 2.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Department of Local Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 09.
...Respondent No.2/
Respondent No.2 3.The Secretary, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.
...Respondent No.3/
Respondent No.3 4.The Director, Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Beach Road, Chennai - 05.
... Respondent No.4/ Respondent No.4 PRAYER : Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code to review the order dated 16.04.2021 in W.A.(MD).No.261 of 2021 and to confirm the order passed in the writ petition.
Prayer in WA(MD). 261 of 2021 :
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent 1/3
against the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.22394 of 2016, dated 23.09.2020.
Prayer in WP(MD). 22394 of 2016 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order dated 28.07.2016 bearing reference No. Na.Ka.N.A1/2550/2010/sri dated 28.07.2016 issued by the 4th Respondent and to consequently direct the 4th Respondent to continue to collect the rents from the Petitioner Association at the prevalent rate. For Petitioner : Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil For Respondent No.1 : Mr.S.Karthikeyan For Respondents 2 to 4 : Mr.A.K.Manickam Standing counsel for Government
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.) The learned Counsel for the petitioner has sent a letter through e-mail, seeking permission to withdraw the Review Application.
2.The said communication is placed on record and the Review Application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) MR Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
2/3
To 1.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Tiruchirappalli.
2.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Local Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 09.
3.The Secretary, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.
4.The Director, Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Beach Road, Chennai - 05.
+1 CC to Mr.RAJINISH PATHIYIL, Advocate ( SR-19243[F] dated 14/06/2021 ) ORDER MADE IN Rev. Aplc.(MD)No.31 of 2021 14.06.2021 KM(21.06.2021) 3P 6C 3/3