R. Saravanakumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.10595 of 2015 1 R. SARAVANAKUMAR 2 R. PUSHPHA LEELA 3 R. AMIRTHAVALLI 4 V. JEYACHANDRAN .. PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 - 4 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.SELVAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, in Crime No.60 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) IPC r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.According to the defacto complainant, the accused have demanded dowry and harassed her.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the respondent police.
4.Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the State.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners 2, 3 and 4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 06/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUMANGALAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DT, 4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
1. CC to M/S.S.SELVAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.36842 DM 8 7 15 2P; 6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10595 of 2015 Date :06/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/