Madras High CourtWP(MD)/719/2020dismissed

K. Balasubramanian v. Chinnathurai

2022-02-15Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.02.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD)No.529 of 2020 K.Balasubramanian

...Petitioner

/Vs./ 1.Chinnathurai, Former Taluk Supply Officer, Tahsildar, District Adi Dravida Welfare Office, District Collector Office, Virudhunagar District. 2.Cheralathan, (Former Revenue Inspector, Mallankinaru), Revenue Inspector, Kariapatti Taluk Office, 3.Rajarajan, (Former Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District), Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Department, South Range, Madurai.

4.Dhanapal, (Former Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aruppukkottai), Additional Superintendent of Police (Prohibition), District Police Office, Tirunelveli.

5.Selvaraj, Inspector of Police, Kariapatti Police Station, 6.Muthuramalingam, Former Head Constable, D.S.P., Office Aruppukkottai, Special Sub-Inspector, Mallankinaru Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

7.The Chair Person, Tamil Nadu Lok Ayuktha, No.6, State Guest House, Old Block, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 7th respondent from proceeding the petitioner's complaint taken in R.No.26 of 2019 1/3

pending on the file of the 7th respondent, based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2020 made to the 7th respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan

ORDER

The novel prayer sought for in this Writ Petition, forbearing the 7th respondent from proceeding the petitioner's complaint taken in R.No.26 of 2019, which is pending with the 7th respondent.

2.It is the contention of the petitioner that the 7th respondent has not properly enquired his complaint. Therefore, the 7th respondent may be restrained to take any action on the complaint given by the petitioner.

3.Having given a complaint before the concerned authorities, now, the petitioner seeks restrained order from enquiry being conducted by the 7th respondent, which is impermissible in law. Therefore, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Myr Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Tahsildar, District Adi Dravida Welfare Office, District Collector Office, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Revenue Inspector, Kariapatti Taluk Office, 3.The Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Department, South Range, Madurai.

2/3

4.The Additional Superintendent of Police (Prohibition), District Police Office, Tirunelveli.

5.Inspector of Police, Kariapatti Police Station, 6.The Chair Person, Tamil Nadu Lok Ayuktha, No.6, State Guest House, Old Block, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

15.02.2022 MGJ(25.02.2022) 3P 7C 3/3